Shemale porn
Every now and then I'll see a shemale actress and think "Damn, she's lucky". She's got the perfect body, a great head of hair, beautiful face, wonderful tits, and a nice big cock.
But then, I think, "She probably doesn't feel very lucky". Firstly, they probably hate that big piece of flesh hanging between their legs. Secondly, growing up likely sucked, a lot. Thirdly, they've had to work hard to get to the point where people would pay money to look at them.
*****************
Some of those perfect gurls are just too perfect. There. I said it. And this is probably just me, but my tastes in other t-girls tend to run to not-quite-perfect. What I'm saying is that some gals are just too pretty, and are too much like women. And I do like women. But, I really like a t-girl who has maybe traces of masculinity still showing.
That doesn't mean hairy balls and unshaved legs in pantyhose. Ick. If that's your thing, fine, but no thanks. It's just that sometimes, it's hard to fantasize to some of the more perfect gurls, because the standard it just too high, and suspension of disbelief is too difficult to attain.
Which leads me to the question of why there isn't more professionally made crossdresser material out there.
The Russians have some. The photos are fantastic, but the videos tend feature a guy with a wig slapped on. But, in the West, most crossdresser porn is amateur-shot. Which usually means poor lighting and shaky camera work.
Of course, there are some who put the effort into it, (and effort is a turn on), but not many. Why not? Is it because most crossdressers are closeted? But, why don't the porn makers get some good looking guys, make them up, and make the quality porn they do for other genres? Cost? It's not cheap, I understand that. And there's probably questions of ROI. (Return on investment) Are they sure there isn't an audience willing to pay for it? (Stupid question, as we're at XHamster, where there's free stuff.)
Rant over. For now.
But then, I think, "She probably doesn't feel very lucky". Firstly, they probably hate that big piece of flesh hanging between their legs. Secondly, growing up likely sucked, a lot. Thirdly, they've had to work hard to get to the point where people would pay money to look at them.
*****************
Some of those perfect gurls are just too perfect. There. I said it. And this is probably just me, but my tastes in other t-girls tend to run to not-quite-perfect. What I'm saying is that some gals are just too pretty, and are too much like women. And I do like women. But, I really like a t-girl who has maybe traces of masculinity still showing.
That doesn't mean hairy balls and unshaved legs in pantyhose. Ick. If that's your thing, fine, but no thanks. It's just that sometimes, it's hard to fantasize to some of the more perfect gurls, because the standard it just too high, and suspension of disbelief is too difficult to attain.
Which leads me to the question of why there isn't more professionally made crossdresser material out there.
The Russians have some. The photos are fantastic, but the videos tend feature a guy with a wig slapped on. But, in the West, most crossdresser porn is amateur-shot. Which usually means poor lighting and shaky camera work.
Of course, there are some who put the effort into it, (and effort is a turn on), but not many. Why not? Is it because most crossdressers are closeted? But, why don't the porn makers get some good looking guys, make them up, and make the quality porn they do for other genres? Cost? It's not cheap, I understand that. And there's probably questions of ROI. (Return on investment) Are they sure there isn't an audience willing to pay for it? (Stupid question, as we're at XHamster, where there's free stuff.)
Rant over. For now.
10 年 前
I've given thought to producing quality crossdresser erotica/porn. I went to school for film/video editing so it's not the lack of skill that is in my way. Equipment is so much cheaper these days and I know plenty of DIY for lighting. I think it would just be finding the girls to do it.